People v. Ebert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating for a proper foundation, \it is necessary to establish only that the test was performed in substantial compliance with the Department's standards\
• stating for a proper foundation, “it is necessary to establish only that the test was performed in substantial compliance with the Department’s standards”
• stating the question of whether the State laid a sufficient foundation for the admission of breath-test results by substantially, but not strictly, complying with administrative regulations was a question of law subject to de novo review
• stating the question of whether the State laid a sufficient foundation for the admission of breath- test results by substantially, but not strictly, complying with administrative regulations was a question of law subject to de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Prather
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-29· cited 16×
• People v. Clairmont
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-29· cited 9×
• People v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-09· cited 7×
• Romsa v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of Transportation
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2012-11-20· cited 5×
• People v. Chiaravalle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-23· cited 4×
• People v. Olson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-06-28· cited 4×
• People v. Caraballo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-07-17· cited 1×