People v. Earle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that knowledge of contents of money bag taken from pharmacy was unnecessary to sustain conviction of theft of cash inside the bag
• holding that knowledge of contents of money bag taken from pharmacy was unnecessary to sustain conviction of theft of cash inside the bag
• holding that knowledge of contents of money bag taken from pharmacy was unnecessary to sustain conviction of theft of cash inside the bag
• \What is important here is that the defendant intended to steal the bag and its contents.... It is not necessary that he knew its contents in advance.\
• \What is important here is that the defendant intended to steal the bag and its contents.... It is not necessary that he knew its contents in advance.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).