Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/23/2000

People v. Durham

Citations

727 N.E.2d 623
312 Ill. App. 3d 413
245 Ill. Dec. 176
2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that gunshot wound which was described as “a small nick or cut” and for which the victim refused medical treatment did not constitute “severe bodily injury”
noting that under Whitney, “the required severe bodily injury must be inflicted during the commission of the Class X or Class 1 felony”
victim’s gunshot wound described as a mark, ‘ “like a small nick or cut” ’
no severe bodily injury where the bullet wound was described as “ ‘a small nick or cut’ ”
victim’s gunshot wound described as a mark, “ ‘like a small nick or cut’ ”
“nicks and cuts are similar in nature to lacerations, abrasions, and bruises” and are sufficient to establish “bodily harm” under the battery statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.