People v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the appellate court held that the circuit court acted improperly in imposing, as a condition of probation, the requirement that the defendant get a short haircut and maintain his appearance in a manner approved by the probation office
• the appellate court held that the circuit court acted improperly in imposing, as a condition of probation, the requirement that the defendant get a short haircut and maintain his appearance in a manner approved by the probation office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Meyer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-04-17· cited 49×
• People Ex Rel. Harrod v. Illinois Courts Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 45×
• People v. Goossens
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2015-10-30· cited 25×
• People v. Hubble
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-04· cited 23×
• People v. M.P.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 13×
• In re Jawan S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-05-17· cited 10×
• People v. Joseph
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-30· cited 8×
• People v. Whittington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-08-20· cited 8×
• In Interest of MP
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 5×
• People v. Renner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-18· cited 3×
• People v. Vaughn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-31· cited 3×
• People v. Renner Opinion text corrected
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-18
• People ex rel. Wright v. Wright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-29