People v. Dunlap
Citations
- 113 Cal. 72
- 45 P. 183
- 1896 Cal. LEXIS 746
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Perjury—Indictment—Swearing of Defendant—Positive Averment Required.—An. indictment for perjury which contains no positive averment that the defendant was sworn, and that the person who administered the oath had authority therefor, is insufficient; and it is not enough that that fact may be supplied by intendment, or implication, or be stated argumentatively, or by way of recital or inference from the language of the indictment.</p>
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court· 1937-10-28· cited 34×
- People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-08-14· cited 28×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-01-19· cited 11×
- State v. WoolridgeOregon Supreme Court· 1904-10-17· cited 4×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-12-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.