People v. Dunkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that daily one-hour visits to house with no apparent residents, covered windows, high electrical consumption and officer’s opinion supported probable cause
• neither the Fourth Amendment nor Colorado State Constitution was violated by disclosure of power records
• neither the Fourth Amendment nor Colorado State Constitution was violated by disclosure of power records
• utility records not protected from disclosure under art. II, § 7 of the Colorado Constitution
• expressly following Kluss in this regard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Dunkin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Dunkin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-08-23
• People v. Dunkin
  California Court of Appeal· 1942-06-29