People v. Dummett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that In re Grand Jury Subpoenas is “in the minority”
• affirming trial court’s ruling that argument raised for the first time in a motion for reconsideration had been waived
• discussing the “heightened” standard for allowing discovery of opinion work product, but declining to determine whether it is “absolute”
• rejecting argument “that the privilege applies only where the underlying client information that is the subject of the communication is confidential”
• adopting the “because of’ test and rejecting the “primarily to assist in litigation” test
• “Disclosing attorney-client communications to a third party . . . generally undermines the privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).