People v. Duffy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \any sentence which provides for a minimum exceeding two-thirds of the maximum is improper as failing to comply with the indeterminate sentence act\
• “any sentence which provides for a minimum exceeding two-thirds of the maximum is improper as failing to comply with the indeterminate sentence act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Huber
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-09-26· cited 74×
• Duffy v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 73×
• Williamson v. Hawai'i Paroling Authority
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-11-29· cited 36×
• People v. Redwine
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-12-10· cited 24×
• Paul D. Duffy, Jr. v. Dale E. Foltz
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-10-23· cited 21×
• In Re Certified Question
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-08-05· cited 15×
• Duffy v. Foltz
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-08-05· cited 7×
• Paul D. Duffy, Jr. v. Dale E. Foltz
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-09-13· cited 5×
• People v. Vandiver
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-11-09· cited 5×
• People v. Philpot
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-06-16· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Tanner
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1972-07-26· cited 259×
• People v. Woody
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 49×
• People v. Krugman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1966-04-05· cited 48×
• People v. Livingston
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-01-27· cited 21×
• People v. McBride
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1974-08-27· cited 10×
• People v. Culpepper
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-03-10· cited 6×