People v. Dudley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no error or unfairness found in the pre-trial procedures used to identify the defendant where the victim spoke no English and her son-in-law, who was also a victim of the robbery, acted as interpreter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Poon
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-10-30· cited 33×
• People v. Claxton
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-03-02· cited 28×
• People v. Smith
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-07-11· cited 26×
• People v. Johnwell
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-08-30· cited 25×
• People v. Sequeira
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-11-25· cited 23×
• Nguyen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-09-20· cited 6×
• People v. Handcock
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1983-06-03· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pate v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
• People v. Pennington
  California Supreme Court· 1967-04-27· cited 212×
• People v. Melissakis
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-03-05· cited 26×
• People v. Tomas
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-09-28· cited 20×
• People v. Hays
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-01-23· cited 17×