Skip to main content

People v. D.T.

Citations

  • 325 Ill. App. 3d 502
  • 758 N.E.2d 335
  • 259 Ill. Dec. 212
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing respondent’s appeal where the notice of appeal was filed 31 days after final order was entered
  • dismissing respondent’s appeal from an order terminating her parental rights pursuant to Rule 303, as the notice of appeal was filed 31 days after final order was entered
  • held there was nothing in record to support the parent's assertion that the date stamped on the notice of appeal was not the actual filing date
  • held there was nothing in record to support the parent's assertion that the date stamped on the notice of appeal was not the actual filing date
  • “The denial of a contested motion to dismiss an appeal before briefing and argument is not final and may be revised at any time before the disposition of the appeal.”
  • court would not excuse compliance with appeal rules by amending filing date of notice of appeal that was filed one day too late, even though court had previously granted a motion to treat the notice of appeal as timely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.