· 3/4/2011
People v. Dorothy H.
Citations
- 945 N.E.2d 81
- 407 Ill. App. 3d 858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the respondent forfeited her challenge regarding wardship where she did not object or present an argument regarding wardship in the trial court
- to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it even in cases under the Act
- to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it even in cases under the Act
- to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody matters, object at the disposition hearing and file a posttrial motion addressing it
- “It is well established that, to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody cases, object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it.”
- “It is well established that, to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody cases, object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.