Skip to main content
· 3/4/2011

People v. Dorothy H.

Citations

  • 945 N.E.2d 81
  • 407 Ill. App. 3d 858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the respondent forfeited her challenge regarding wardship where she did not object or present an argument regarding wardship in the trial court
  • to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it even in cases under the Act
  • to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it even in cases under the Act
  • to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody matters, object at the disposition hearing and file a posttrial motion addressing it
  • “It is well established that, to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody cases, object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it.”
  • “It is well established that, to preserve an alleged error for appellate review, a party must, even in child custody cases, object at trial and file a written posttrial motion addressing it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.