Skip to main content
· 2/7/2012

People v. Dorce

Citations

  • 92 A.D.3d 692
  • 937 N.Y.2d 885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing standard for vacatur based on a potential conflict of interest
  • dismissing “remaining contentions” as “either unpreserved ... or without merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.