People v. Donato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant’s pre-Padilla claim that he was given mis-advice about the immigration consequences of his plea to be cognizable in a habeas proceeding
• observing the distinction between “affirmative misadvice” and “no advice” regarding immigration consequences
• “Padilla’s rule . . . encompassed a well-recognized standard—an effective counsel may not affirmatively misadvise a client.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).