People v. Dolph-Hostetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The marital-communications privilege is invoked at the time of the pertinent court proceedings and thus is not Vested’ at an earlier date.”
• retroactive application of a new exception to the marital privilege did not violate the ex post facto clause because the new rule simply affected what evidence might be introduced at trial and did not change quantum of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).