People v. Dinkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that immigration-related detainees’ claims “fall within the ‘core’ of the writ of habeas corpus”
• holding that venue is improper outside the district of confinement
• acknowledging that immigration-related detainees’ claims “fall within the ‘core’ of the writ of habeas corpus”
• acknowledging that immigration- related detainees’ claims “fall within the ‘core’ of the writ of habeas corpus”
• explaining that noncitizen detainees challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act must do so in habeas
• holding that venue is improper outside the district of confinement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).