Michigan Court of Appeals· 12/10/2013

People v. Dillard

Citations

303 Mich. App. 372
845 N.W.2d 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that asportation may still occur even if the victim voluntarily accompanies the defendant to a place or situation of greater danger
explaining that a defendant’s actions can provide circumstantial evidence of his intent to commit great bodily harm, and that “it is not necessary for any actual injury to occur.”
explaining that a defendant’s actions can provide circumstantial evidence of his intent to commit great bodily harm, and that “it is not necessary for any actual injury to occur.”
the extent of an injury is -4- probative of the intent to cause the requisite quantum of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krause, Whitbeck, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Dillard

53 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.