People v. Dill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was genuine issue of material fact as to whether entity that rented premises from owner had assumed duty to keep premises safe for benefit of invitee for purposes of § 324A
• concluding defendant assumed duty of removing ice on the ground in a high traffic area at a ranch retreat
• stating that, “to impose liability under section 324A(b), one who undertakes a duty owed by another to a third person must completely assume the duty”
• distinguishing Isler and concluding that temporary occupants of a retreat facility did not assume the property owner’s duties to perform maintenance as to ice-covered walkways on the property
• in a contribution action \the remaining obligors are required to contribute to the extent [that the one] discharged the obligation in excess of what could justly be claimed from him\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).