People v. Diesel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• police observation that defendant and others were seated at a table with cards in their hands and currency in front of them constituted sufficient circumstantial evidence to find defendant guilty of gambling beyond a reasonable doubt, although officers never observed actual wagers
• police observation that defendant and others were seated at a table with cards in their hands and currency in front of them constituted sufficient circumstantial evidence to find defendant guilty of gambling beyond a reasonable doubt, although officers never observed actual wagers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).