Skip to main content
· 9/24/1980

People v. Diercks

Citations

  • 411 N.E.2d 97
  • 88 Ill. App. 3d 1073
  • 44 Ill. Dec. 191
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when the clergyman does not object to testifying, the burden is on the person asserting the privilege to show that disclosure is enjoined by the rules or practices of the relevant religion
  • confession given after police officer told defendant that anything he said “was between he and I” not involuntary where the promise of confidentiality did not deprive defendant of his free will
  • “When the clergyman does not object to testifying the burden is on the person asserting the privilege to show that disclosure is enjoined by the rules or practices of the relevant religion.”
  • confession made in presence of police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.