People v. Didyavong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[s]tatutory violation or not,” because there was no concrete harm from the debt collector’s admonishing letters, plaintiff's allegations that the debt collector’s conduct was “deceptive and unconscionable in violation of the FDCPA” were not sufficient to establish standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).