People v. Diaz
Citations
- 6 Cal. 248
- 1856 Cal. LEXIS 116
Syllabus
<p>In criminal caSos, on a motion for continuance by defendant, on the ground of the absence of a material witness, based on a sufficient affidavit, the agreement of the district attorney that the witness, if present, would have deposed as averred in defendant's affidavit, is not sufficient to warrant the overruling of the motion.</p> <p>The district attorney should have admitted the truth of the facts, to which the witness would testify, absolutely.</p> <p>It is the right of the accused to have his witnesses orally examined in Court, and to confront them, with those called, to impeach their testimony.</p> <p>Under our statute, motions for continuance in criminal oases, are subject to review upon appeal*.</p>
Judges: Murray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 52×
- People v. SlighMichigan Supreme Court· 1882-04-05· cited 28×
- Pace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1889-10-17· cited 22×
- State v. KlineSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1903-01-05· cited 20×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 19×
- People v. SavantMichigan Supreme Court· 1897-04-06· cited 5×
- State v. HenryNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1918-05-31· cited 1×
- People v. GallartSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1906-11-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.