Skip to main content
· 11/26/1986

People v. DeVoss

Citations

  • 501 N.E.2d 840
  • 150 Ill. App. 3d 38
  • 103 Ill. Dec. 523
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 3149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating if passenger does not know there is open bottle in vehicle, “there can be little practical justification for concluding that he contributed to the danger which the instant prohibition addresses”
  • stating if passenger does not know there is open bottle in vehicle, \there can be little practical justification for concluding that he contributed to the danger which the instant prohibition addresses\
  • “we are not compelled by a rule of horizontal, district-to-district stare decisis to adopt the decision of the Fourth District”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.