People v. D'Esposito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the doctrine inapplicable when the parties' relationship is based on a written agreement or contract
• holding that plaintiff who brought a claim against a person who was not a party to the contract “must show that [the defendant] wrongfully secured or passively received a benefit that it would be unconscionable for her to retain”
• \The doctrine of unjust enrichment is clearly `inapplicable when the relationship between the parties is founded on a written agreement or express contract.'\ (internal citations omitted)
• “The doctrine of unjust enrichment is clearly ‘inapplicable when the relationship between the parties is founded on a written agreement or express contract.’ ” (internal citations omitted)
• recovery on claim of unjust enrichment allowed where defendant wrongfully secured or passively received a benefit that it would be unconscionable 4 to retain
• “The doctrine of unjust enrichment is clearly inapplicable when the relationship between the parties is founded on a written agreement or express contract.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).