Skip to main content

People v. Dendel

Citations

  • 289 Mich. App. 445
  • 797 N.W.2d 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony based on a report prepared by non-testifying forensic analysts violated defendant’s confrontation rights
  • discussing numerous confrontation clause cases involving forensic reports and holding that statements in analyst’s report of glucose tests requested by medical examiner were testimonial
  • discussing numerous confrontation clause cases involving forensic reports and holding that statements in analyst's report of glucose tests requested by medical examiner were testimonial
  • explaining the harmless error standard for constitutional errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borrello, Saad, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.