People v. Delsordo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the opposing party had an additional two weeks after the motion to prepare a response, and therefore “the purpose of Rule 37(a)’s notice requirement was not frustrated”
• considering, although ultimately denying, plaintiff’s motion to compel the deposition of a former government employee when the government opposed the use of classified information during the deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).