People v. Deloney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt mitigated likelihood that jury convicted defendant based on State’s improper remarks
• criticizing the State’s use of pejorative terms (“crack-head”) to describe defendant during opening and closing, but finding it did not rise to level of reversible error
• overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt mitigated likelihood that jury convicted defendant based on State’s improper remarks
• overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt mitigated likelihood jury convicted defendant based on State’s improper remarks
• criticizing the State’s use of pejorative terms (“crack-head”) to describe defendant during opening and closing, but finding it did not rise to level of reversible error
• criticizing the State’s use of pejorative terms (“crack-head”) to describe the - 30 - 2025 IL App (2d) 240160-U defendant during opening and closing, but finding it did not rise to the level of reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).