People v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[f]ingerprints, like a man’s name, height, color of his eyes, and physiognomy, are subject to non-custodial police inquiry, report and preservation when reasonable investigation requires, even though probable cause for arrest may not exist at the moment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hansen v. Owens
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-10-08· cited 39×
• Nuriel v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-11-05· cited 18×
• People v. Davis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-04-16· cited 13×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-07-31· cited 12×
• People v. Trudeau
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-09-28· cited 4×
• Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2019-11-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Davis v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,385×
• United States v. Bonanno
  S.D. New York· 1960-01-12· cited 89×
• People v. Davis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-12-19· cited 1×