Illinois Supreme Court· 10/31/1991

People v. Davis

Citations

582 N.E.2d 714
145 Ill. 2d 240
164 Ill. Dec. 151
1991 Ill. LEXIS 103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant’s misapprehension of the law pertaining to his eligibility for probation or conditional discharge caused him to forego 8 his trial rights
“[w]hether reversal is required depends on whether real justice has been denied or whether defendant has been prejudiced by the inadequate admonishment”
“Generally, under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 604(d), any issue not raised by the defendant in his motion to withdraw the plea of guilty shall be deemed [forfeited] upon appeal.”
in analyzing Rule 402, we stated that “[w]hether reversal is required depends on whether real justice has been denied or whether [the] defendant has been prejudiced by the inadequate admonishment”
“subjective impressions alone are not sufficient grounds on which to vacate a guilty plea”
also finding improper admonishment regarding possible sentence reviewable as plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas J. Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.