Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/19/1986

People v. Davis

Citations

498 N.E.2d 633
147 Ill. App. 3d 800
101 Ill. Dec. 309
1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting the defendant’s trial demand in rejecting the defendant’s claim that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his mid-trial motion for a continuance
considering fact that defendant had previously demanded trial in holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion for continuance to obtain alibi witness
considering fact that defendant had previously demanded trial in holding -9 No. 1-14-0785 that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion for continuance to obtain alibi witness
appellate court noted the defendant’s demand for trial in rejecting the defendant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his mid-trial motion for a continuance
appellate court noted the defendant's demand for trial in rejecting the defendant's contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his mid-trial motion for a continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray, Pincham, Pinch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.