Illinois Supreme Court· 1/25/2002

People v. Davis

Citations

766 N.E.2d 641
199 Ill. 2d 130
262 Ill. Dec. 721
2002 Ill. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when a defendant challenges only the provisions of á statute as interpreted by the trial court and not the facts of the case, a question of law is presented and a de novo standard of review applies
holding a BB/pellet gun did not qualify as a “bludgeon” under the armed violence statute
holding a BB/pellet gun did not qualify as a ‘bludgeon’ under the armed violence statute
holding that when a defendant challenges only the provisions of a statute as interpreted by the trial court and not the facts of the case, a question of law is presented and a de novo standard of review applies
holding a BB/pellet gun did not qualify as a ‘bludgeon’ under the armed violence statute
noting a pellet gun could be “used as a bludgeon” even as it held, as a matter of law, that a pellet gun was not a bludgeon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMORROW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.