People v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that special prosecutor’s “incumbency was illegal” because he was illegally appointed, but adding that under the de facto officer doctrine, his “authority . . . in this instance could not be attacked collaterally, but required a proceeding instituted directly for that purpose”
• upholding the acts of an illegally appointed special prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Herrick
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-07-12· cited 13×
• People v. Stackpoole
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-07-15· cited 9×
• State v. Roark
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 4×
• People v. Jackson
  New York Supreme Court· 1989-12-06· cited 4×
• State v. Breeze
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-05-06· cited 3×
• In Re Petition for Appointment of Special Prosecutor
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-01-20· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lindskog v. Rosebud Mines, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-03-09· cited 16×
• State v. Bell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-03-02· cited 14×