Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/24/2010

People v. Davis

Citations

924 N.E.2d 67
398 Ill. App. 3d 940
338 Ill. Dec. 207
2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that hot pursuit doctrine was inapplicable where officers tried to initiate a warrantless arrest despite that fact that defendant had never been in public
finding that hot pursuit doctrine was inapplicable where officers tried to initiate a warrantless arrest despite the fact that defendant had never been in public
“Consent is involuntary where it is solely the result of acquiescence or submission to the assertion of lawful police authority.”
officers entered defendant’s home without warrant after observing defendant, already inside his home, flee further inside
no hot pursuit when suspect opened door to apartment and retreated further inside
even upon allegation of battery, police had no reason to believe that the defendant was armed, that a weapon had been used in underlying offense, or that the defendant had a violent history to justify warrantless entry into the home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.