People v. Davion T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \claims . . . barred by absolute judicial immunity . . . [are] correctly dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6)\
• holding that “claims barred by absolute judicial immunity [are] correctly dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6)”
• holding that claims “barred by absolute judicial immunity [are] correctly dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6)”
• concluding that “we may assume hypothetical jurisdiction” for statutory jurisdictional issues
• finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations in support of his conspiracy claims … [were] uniformly conclusory, speculative, and implausible … [and therefore were] inadequate to support his conspiracy claims under RICO”
• noting that “district judges within [the Second Circuit] that have grappled with this issue have concluded that [Rooker-Feldman] applies even where there is a pending state appeal of the challenged judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).