Skip to main content
· 7/26/2017

People v. David T. (In re David T.)

Citations

  • 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 33
  • 13 Cal. App. 5th 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying predecessor provision to modern pre-termitted spousal share as intended to “provide against the improvidence of husbands who should neglect to alter, their wills in accordance with the changed circumstances caused by subsequent marriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.