· 7/26/2017
People v. David T. (In re David T.)
Citations
- 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 33
- 13 Cal. App. 5th 866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- identifying predecessor provision to modern pre-termitted spousal share as intended to “provide against the improvidence of husbands who should neglect to alter, their wills in accordance with the changed circumstances caused by subsequent marriage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kline
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.