People v. David N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence was legally sufficient to establish victims’ losses in case where defendant pleaded guilty to burglary and was allowed “complete cross-examination of the witnesses” at a hearing “to determine the fruits of the offense or the loss or damage caused by the offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Francis L. M.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-12-27· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Rescia
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-01-06· cited 3×
• People v. Aliseo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-11-28· cited 2×
• In re J.S.
  NYC Family Court· 2007-03-21· cited 1×
• Matter of J.S.
  Nassau Family Court· 2007-03-21