People v. Daugherty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that when statute directed payment “to the victim” allowing payment to insurance company “would significantly broaden the reach of the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Evans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-03-16· cited 44×
• People v. Lawrence
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-31· cited 24×
• State v. Gardiner
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1995-06-09· cited 17×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-15· cited 11×
• State v. Westerman
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-09-18· cited 10×
• People v. D.R.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-19· cited 10×
• People v. Sweeney
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-03-22· cited 8×
• People v. Metoxen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-11-03· cited 5×
• People v. Singleton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-25· cited 3×
• People v. Hickey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-26· cited 3×
• In Re DR
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 580×
• In re T.E.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 65×
• People v. Stueve
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 39×
• People v. Wilson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-08-25· cited 22×
• People v. Knowles
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-30· cited 19×