People v. Darcella D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the doctrine of part performance cannot save contracts governed by General Obligations Law § 5-701\
• holding that “the doctrine of part performance cannot save contracts governed by General Obligations Law § 5-701”
• holding that “the doctrine of part performance cannot save contracts governed by General Obligations Law § 5-701”
• holding that the doctrine of part performance is not recognized to take an oral contract to board and breed horses that was not to be performed within one year out of the Statute of Frauds
• finding that “the Statute of Frauds is an available defense to plaintiffs claim that an implied-in-fact contract existed between the parties.”
• “A contract may not be implied in fact from the conduct of the parties where it appears that they intended to be bound only by a formal written agree ment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).