Skip to main content

People v. Daniel

Citations

  • 609 N.W.2d 557
  • 462 Mich. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s remorse is not a sufficient mitigating factor to support an out-of-guidelines sentence under the then-mandatory sentencing guidelines
  • holding that a show of remorse is a subjective factor that is not objective and verifiable and therefore cannot support a departing sentence
  • noting remorse is a subjective factor that does not justify departure from a statutory mandatory minimum drug sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanagh, Corrigan, Kelly, Markman, Taylor, Weaver, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.