People v. C.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there was no showing that the district attorney’s testimony would be needed or that it would prevent a fair trial
• characterizing the appearance of impropriety standard as arising under the disqualification statute
• characterizing the appearance of impropriety standard as arising under the disqualification statute
• defining “appearance of impropriety” as a circumstance in which, although the district attorney has no “direct interest” in the case, he or she nevertheless “has ‘an interest’ in the matter aside from his or her ‘professional responsibility of upholding the law5 ”
• \It is incumbent upon the defendant to present sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that he or she will be denied a fair trial if the prosecuting attorney is allowed to proceed with the prosecution.\
• “It is incumbent upon the defendant to present sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that he or she will be denied a fair trial if the prosecuting attorney is allowed to proceed with the prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).