People v. Cush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the subject clause cannot reasonably be interpreted as limited to third-party claims,” particularly in the context of other clauses in the contract
• holding, where language limiting indemnification to third-party actions appeared in only one of two key sentences in an indemnity clause, that the more expansive sentence encompassed attorney’s fees in suits on the contract between the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).