People v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice
• the defendant in a homicide case “was entitled and bound to take an interest in the life and safety of his brother,” and his use of a deadly weapon to that end was not necessarily evidence of malice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Kurr
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-12-26· cited 159×
• Leeper v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1979-01-19· cited 49×
• Mortimore v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1916-12-23· cited 34×
• Duckett v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-09-04· cited 26×
• People v. Wright
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-07-29· cited 14×
• Johnigan v. Elo
  E.D. Michigan· 2002-05-17· cited 7×
• Watson v. Ristow
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-07-31· cited 3×
• People Of Mi V Micheline Nicole Leffew
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2022-01-26
• People of Michigan v. Micheline Nicole Leffew
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2022-01-26
• People of Michigan v. Jeremiah James Leffew
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2022-01-26
• People v. Jatros
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1923-03-23