Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/9/2004

People v. Curtis

Citations

820 N.E.2d 1116
354 Ill. App. 3d 312
290 Ill. Dec. 49
2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the defendant had waived his argument that a prior consistent statement was improperly admitted
finding the defendant had waived his argument that a prior consistent statement was improperly admitted
finding the defendant had waived his argument that a prior consistent statement was improperly admitted
finding the defendant had waived his argument that a prior consistent statement was improperly admitted
no minimum period of time defendant required to remain present outside victim’s car to constitute “surveillance” within meaning of Illinois stalking statute
a reviewing court must not focus on isolated words or statements of the trial court to determine whether reversible error occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.