People v. Cullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since there was sufficient evidence to show defendant wrongfully forged Boyer’s name to the check, without authority, the trial court had the right to infer, from the circumstances established, that defendant intended to defraud someone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Cullen
  California Supreme Court· 1951-07-27· cited 155×
• People v. Obie
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-09-13· cited 38×
• People v. Brown
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-11-18· cited 9×
• Bowry v. People
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2009-07-28· cited 6×
• People v. Battle
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-01-27· cited 3×
• People v. Suciu
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-08-05· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Agnew
  California Supreme Court· 1940-11-29· cited 90×
• People v. Caldwell
  California Court of Appeal· 1942-10-28· cited 45×
• People v. Whiteman
  California Supreme Court· 1896-09-19· cited 40×
• People v. Mitchell
  California Supreme Court· 1891-12-30· cited 28×
• People v. Stoddard
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-04-21· cited 19×
• People v. Cline
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-04-10· cited 18×
• People v. Lundin
  California Supreme Court· 1897-05-25· cited 17×
• Kiekhoefer v. United States National Bank
  California Supreme Court· 1934-12-21· cited 13×
• People v. Wade
  California Court of Appeal· 1943-02-04· cited 1×