Colorado Court of Appeals· 6/6/2005
People v. Cross
Citations
- 114 P.3d 1
- 2004 WL 439361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sufficient evidence of serious emotional distress when victim testified that the defendant’s behavior caused her to change her work schedule, feel nervous, and have trouble sleeping
- “A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to the assistance of counsel, which includes the right to conflict-free counsel”
- absence of definition of \serious emotional distress\ did not render section 18-9-111(4)(b)(IIl) unconstitutionally vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roy, Casebolt, Piccone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. BeckerColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 687×
- People v. WagnerColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 320×
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-01-17· cited 92×
- People v. CareyColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-04-17· cited 25×
- People v. ChaseColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-03-14· cited 9×
- People v. SilvaColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-04-17· cited 4×
- Piris v. KitchingWashington Supreme Court· 2016-07-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.