People v. Cromwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “defendants admit to a policy of never offering the [tying product] separately from the [tied product]”
• an \unremitting policy of tie-in\ if accompanied by sufficient market power constitutes coercion
• an “unremitting policy of tie-in” if accompanied by sufficient market power constitutes coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).