California Supreme Court· 7/27/1967
People v. Cramer
Citations
- 67 Cal. 2d 126
- 429 P.2d 582
- 60 Cal. Rptr. 230
- 1967 Cal. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admission, for purpose of showing common design, plan or modus operands of prior act with another youth occurring during same time period as offense charged, in trial for the same acts with 13-year-old boy, upheld because of sufficient similarities in method
- admission, for purpose of showing common design, plan or modus operandi, of prior act with another youth occurring during same time period as offense charged, in trial for the same acts with 13-year-old boy, upheld because of sufficient similarities in method
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.