Skip to main content

People v. Cramer

Citations

  • 67 Cal. 2d 126
  • 429 P.2d 582
  • 60 Cal. Rptr. 230
  • 1967 Cal. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • admission, for purpose of showing common design, plan or modus operands of prior act with another youth occurring during same time period as offense charged, in trial for the same acts with 13-year-old boy, upheld because of sufficient similarities in method
  • admission, for purpose of showing common design, plan or modus operandi, of prior act with another youth occurring during same time period as offense charged, in trial for the same acts with 13-year-old boy, upheld because of sufficient similarities in method

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.