New York Court of Appeals· 12/14/1982

People v. Cousart

Citations

58 N.Y.2d 62
444 N.E.2d 971
458 N.Y.S.2d 507
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“This court cannot assume, without the benefit of a record compiled at . . . a hearing or at the retrial, that any prejudice did result.”
where original delayed appeal resulted in reversal and remand for new trial, the defendant must, in order to have indictment dismissed on ground of delay, show that delay resulted in prejudice to his rights in the new proceedings in the trial court
where original delayed appeal resulted in reversal and remand for new trial, the defendant must, in order to have indictment dismissed on ground of delay, show that delay resulted in prejudice to his rights in the new proceedings in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Cousart

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.