People v. Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the trial court’s ruling concerning admissibility to prove motive is not manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair . . . we need not determine whether the evidence was admissible for [opportunity, plan, or identity].”
• penitentiary packets admissible to prove habitual criminal charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).