Skip to main content

People v. Cooper

Citations

  • 205 P.3d 475
  • 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1835
  • 2008 WL 4742207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the defendant’s habitual sentence even though neither the triggering nor the predicate offenses were individually grave and serious
  • even assuming that triggering and predicate theft offenses were not individually grave and serious per se, in combination the offenses were sufficiently grave and serious to support defendant's eighteen-year sentence
  • even assuming that triggering and predicate car theft offenses were not individually grave and serious per se, in combination they were grave and serious
  • even where none of the predicate or triggering offenses is individually grave or serious, they may be sufficiently grave or serious in combination
  • even assuming that triggering and predicate theft offenses were not individually grave and serious per se, in combination the offenses were sufficiently grave and serious to support defendant's eighteen-year sentence
  • even assuming that triggering and predicate theft offenses were not individually grave and serious per se, in combination the offenses were sufficiently grave and serious to support defendant 's eighteen-year sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernard, Dailey, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.