Skip to main content

People v. Cooper

Citations

  • 601 N.W.2d 409
  • 236 Mich. App. 643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision not to call an identification expert is not objectively unreasonable
  • holding that where defense counsel “elicited apparent discrepancies,” the presumption of permissive trial strategy is not overcome
  • holding that the decision not to call an identification expert is not objectively unreasonable
  • finding that defense counsel at trial was not ineffective for “failing to present expert psychological testimony about how the circumstances of the incident could have impaired [a witness's] perception, memory, and ability to recognize the shooter.”
  • rejecting an ineffective assistance of counsel claim where there was no record of what steps if any the trial counsel took to investigate the matter
  • rejecting an ineffective assistance of counsel claim where there was no record of what steps if any the trial counsel took to investigate the matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanagh, Holbrook, WfflTBECK, Whitbeck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.